The Hedonist’s Dilemma
نویسنده
چکیده
It is common to group theories of well-being into the following three categories: hedonism (the view that pleasure is the sole prudential good; pain the sole bad), desire-satisfactionism (a wide swath of views that claim, roughly speaking, that a person’s welfare depends on the satisfaction of her desires), and the objective-list (the view that prudential value is independent of an agent’s pro-attitudes toward purported goods). This taxonomy, however, is imperfect (which is not to say that it is not useful). Importantly, it seems to miss tremendous amounts of logical space– not all non-hedonist, non-objective list views must fall into the category of desire satisfaction. (Importantly, perfectionism comes to mind, as do various hybrid views.1) I propose the following tripartite grouping. In a rough-andready way, the first category, hedonism, suggests that pleasure is the sole prudential good for humans. The second category, subjectivism, holds that in explaining why φ is good for x, one must appeal to the x ’s agential endorsement of φ, most commonly some desire or preference. Finally, a third category is objectivism. Objective views insist that welfare goods need not be endorsed; objectivism denies that agential endorsement is a necessary condition on welfare. Objective theories can, in principle, evaluate lives by criteria independent of an agent’s various pro-attitudes, whether desiderative or otherwise. But this taxonomy is also a bit strange. One of these categories is not like the others. Logical space appears to be fully covered by the distinction between subjective theories, which suggest that a necessary condition for the prudential value of φ is agential endorsement of φ, and objective theories, which deny this. Where, then, does hedonism fall? There are options for the hedonist; hedonism can be construed subjectively or objectively. However, as I shall try to show here, this choice creates
منابع مشابه
The dilemma of Rationality or Providing Efficiency in Monetary Policy Making: An Application of Arrow’s
Financial frictions inducted in the model is a new contribution to monetary economics. Herein, an analytical tool arranges monetary policymaking in the form of two steps procedure. In the first step, an appropriate amount of money supply should be assessed; and in the second step, that appropriate amount should be allocated to several sectors. The Central Bank obligates the step of assessment a...
متن کاملCemento-Ossifying Fibroma A Radiographic Diagnostic Dilemma
Cemento-ossifying fibroma (COF) is a rare benign fibro-osseous tumor. The radiographic and clinical features of this lesion are unpredictable and variable. In this report, the patient was a 12-year old girl with a painless swelling which demonstrated an opaque lesion with radiolucent zone to involve left posterior portion of the mandible on panoramic radiography. The radiographic manifestati...
متن کاملNodular Cystic Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Trunk: a Diagnostic Dilemma in an Unsuspecting Youth
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) commonly affects the elderly and is mostly confined to the head and neck region. Only 10% of all cases occur on the trunk. We presented a case of bullous lesion on the abdomen in a young male, initially diagnosed by clinicians as a vascular nevus. Histopathological examination and immunohistochemistry (IHC) revealed it to be Nodular cystic variant of BCC. This rare va...
متن کامل